Channels
Log in register
piqd uses cookies and other analytical tools to offer this service and to enhance your user experience.

Your podcast discovery platform

Curious minds select the most fascinating podcasts from around the world. Discover hand-piqd audio recommendations on your favorite topics.

You are currently in channel:

Health and Sanity

Rashmi Vasudeva
Features writer on health, lifestyle and the Arts, digital marketing blogger, mother
View piqer profile
piqer: Rashmi Vasudeva
Thursday, 15 June 2017

Listen Up Silicon Valley, Cancer Cure Ain't So Easy

You must have already read about Silicon Valley's quest to make us all immortal. Within this grand dream, is another, arguably more urgent ambition - to cure the big C.

Recently, there have been a spate of articles about how Silicon Valley is actively trying to find cures for cancer. For instance, Nvidia has tied up with the National Cancer Institute to research the use of AI against cancer. There is also former Vice President Joe Biden's (whose son died from cancer) pet project Moonshot, aimed at improving cancer treatments. So far so good.

The media has mostly been laudatory of these efforts, and rightly so, to a certain extent. But not many are questioning whether Silicon Valley’s view of cancer as a "start-up" challenge that could be solved by big data, engineering and funds, is reasonable. This article does precisely that.

Cancer, as an Oslo University professor quoted in the story says, is not space travel. Nor is it an engineering problem that can be tackled by identifying bugs and removing glitches. Cancer is organic; cancer is an ecological problem and cancer cells are fiendishly clever shape-shifters that constantly change strategies.

The author, himself a data scientist, argues that computational approaches assume that data is complete and cell circuits operate in a closed system, but alas, cancer cells evolve in countless ways and are even known to make ad hoc use of environmental cues. He warns that looking at cancer merely as a "logic problem" where cell circuits go haywire may be more dangerous than helpful. Indeed, this view is popular among Silicon Valley companies as it sits prettily with the kind of systemic approach they are used to - through which they can sell "solutions". Microsoft even declared it would cure cancer by 2026.

As pessimistic it sounds, the author believes it is vital to put it out that as long as cancer cells are crafty, the war cannot be won only through straightforward solutions by technologists, however noble they are.   

Listen Up Silicon Valley, Cancer Cure Ain't So Easy
8
3 votes
relevant?

Would you like to comment? Then register now for free!

Comments 2
  1. Pierre Dybman
    Pierre Dybman · Created nearly 2 years ago ·

    Sure, but on the other way, cancer is also a big numbers problem, with millions of cases each year, and accurate statistics about what works and what doesn't, and what's in between. So, I would tend to think that genetic data on patients and their cancers, plus AI, plus other emerging therapies like immunotherapy can make a huge difference. More on my own story with cancer at dybmapi.livejournal.com

    1. Rashmi Vasudeva
      Rashmi Vasudeva · Created nearly 2 years ago ·

      Certainly. Nobody can dispute that (and neither is the author). His warning is about relying exclusively on big data techniques and ignoring cancer cells' intrinsic behaviour while looking for cures. I will surely check out your story. Thanks for coming by.

Stay up to date – with a newsletter from your channel on Health and Sanity.