Channels
Log in register
piqd uses cookies and other analytical tools to offer this service and to enhance your user experience.

Your podcast discovery platform

Curious minds select the most fascinating podcasts from around the world. Discover hand-piqd audio recommendations on your favorite topics.

You are currently in channel:

Climate and Environment

Santiago Saez Moreno
Journalist
View piqer profile
piqer: Santiago Saez Moreno
Tuesday, 07 August 2018

Winning Earth: Naomi Klein Takes On Nathaniel Rich

Last week I wrote a review about Losing Earth, Nathaniel Rich's huge article for the New York Times Magazine. I found that, despite Rich's remarkable work of documentation and sourcing, beautifully portrayed in a 30,000-word piece with spectacular images, he had missed the key detail in any whodunit: The culprit. As I exposed, it was neoliberalism, embodied in the story by John Sununu, who murdered climate. Due to space constraints, I couldn't develop that idea as much as I wanted.

Luckily, there's Naomi Klein. Here you have the review that I would have liked to write if I had had ten times piqd's word allowance. All similarities (including the title) are completely coincidental, although I must admit that my point of view towards the history of climate change policy is heavily influenced by Klein's book on the topic.

Klein begins by praising the New York Times' commitment to climate change coverage, and criticizing how the media have largely ignored the issue so far. However, early on she shows her discomfort with Nathaniel Rich's main thesis: That the failure to implement binding climate policies at the end of the '80s responded to human nature, and not to the strength of the neoliberal global architecture at the time.

The late ’80s was the absolute zenith of the neoliberal crusade, a moment of peak ideological ascendency for the economic and social project that deliberately set out to vilify collective action in the name of liberating “free markets” in every aspect of life.

This is a key point, as Klein highlights, as the reasons for failure are crucial to choosing our future strategies. If human nature had killed the climate movement back in the '80s, it would be pointless to even try again. 

But, if capitalism killed the climate... well, then we got ourselves a task.

The article ends with Klein pointing out to a new eco-socialist movement that may be, she thinks, exactly the way to go. I think that answer is too slow, but, sadly, I run out of words again.

Winning Earth: Naomi Klein Takes On Nathaniel Rich
8.8
6 votes
relevant?

Would you like to comment? Then register now for free!

Comments 6
  1. Santiago Saez Moreno
    Santiago Saez Moreno · Created 10 months ago ·

    Acknowledgments: Thanks Michael for the heads-up!

  2. User deleted
    User deleted · Created 10 months ago ·

    i wonder whether nathaniel rich deliberately choose to blame 'human nature' as the culprit for the mess because he was 1. certain that others, including a number of scientists and naomi klein, would be eager to name the culprits anyways, and 2. more interested in getting the political discussion + action started over again, which is certainly easier without clearifying the schuldfrage in the first place. would be a clever dual-use strategy!

    1. Santiago Saez Moreno
      Santiago Saez Moreno · Created 10 months ago ·

      Could be! I also think that a lot of New York Times readers would be seriously scared if the whole magazine was devoted to a devastating critique of capitalism...

    2. Santiago Saez Moreno
      Santiago Saez Moreno · Created 10 months ago ·

      @Santiago Saez Moreno Which makes me wonder why arguing that human nature is incompatible with life as we know it is somehow more acceptable than criticising capitalism...

    3. User deleted
      User deleted · Created 10 months ago ·

      @Santiago Saez Moreno to get that one certainly needs some training in jesuite arguing (not necessarily opus dei style). but that's above the scope of a piq comment *smile

    4. User deleted
      User deleted · Created 10 months ago ·

      @Santiago Saez Moreno for those readers the article was certainly scary enough already!

Stay up to date – with a newsletter from your channel on Climate and Environment.