Channels
Log in register
piqd uses cookies and other analytical tools to offer this service and to enhance your user experience.

Your podcast discovery platform

Curious minds select the most fascinating podcasts from around the world. Discover hand-piqd audio recommendations on your favorite topics.

You are currently in channel:

Health and Sanity

Rashmi Vasudeva
Features writer on health, lifestyle and the Arts, digital marketing blogger, mother
View piqer profile
piqer: Rashmi Vasudeva
Wednesday, 31 May 2017

Is Gluten The Bugbear Of Our Times? And Why Are Scientists Playing Catch-Up?

Is gluten the fanciest manufactured bugbear of our times? It certainly appears so, considering how scientific backlash against blindly going gluten-free is gaining momentum.

Scientists are taking note of how alarmist the gluten-free propaganda is becoming and how out of sorts it is with the available data. At its best, data is indeterminate; at its worst, like in the case of gluten’s relation to inflammation, heart disease and cancer, it is plain shaky.

Author James Hamblin snarks his way through a mini-history of gluten obsession and fascinatingly narrates how gluten-free diets jumped out of bestselling "science" tomes and into the public mindscape. It soon outran sober scientific advice to stand at the forefront of glossies, celebrity-endorsements and Google search results for "diets that work".

In the latest such "backlash" study, which the author terms to be a "stern admonition" from scientists, researchers from Harvard and Columbia have concluded that gluten does not cause heart disease, and people without celiac disease “should not be encouraged” to go gluten-free. The study also discovered that people who go gluten-free (without being medically prescribed to do so) might actually be putting themselves at an increased risk of heart disease.

The question to ask here is why are studies to establish/disprove links between gluten and major diseases being conducted in the first place? The answer, provided by the lead researcher, is illuminating: “In talking to patients...(there's) an important difference between saying that there’s no proof that gluten has health effects...and saying that there is proof that gluten has no health effects in the general population.”

The article raises important questions about whether it is science’s duty to “go where the public is interested and provide sound analysis”, or whether this is too vicious a cycle of “buying and belief” that science can never catch up, while bugbears like gluten run miles ahead with followers in tow. 

Is Gluten The Bugbear Of Our Times? And Why Are Scientists Playing Catch-Up?
7.5
2 votes
relevant?

Would you like to comment? Then register now for free!