Channels
Log in register
piqd uses cookies and other analytical tools to offer this service and to enhance your user experience.

Your podcast discovery platform

Curious minds select the most fascinating podcasts from around the world. Discover hand-piqd audio recommendations on your favorite topics.

You are currently in channel:

Globalization and politics

Emran Feroz
Journalist
View piqer profile
piqer: Emran Feroz
Sunday, 20 May 2018

How Civilian Airstrike Deaths In Afghanistan Are Barely Investigated

Civilian casualties after airstrikes by the US airforce or the Afghan military are taking place regularly in Afghanistan. 

Mostly, nobody cares about these victims as I have seen and investigated myself in several Afghan provinces.

Recently, Human Rights Watch did a great job to expose this reality. 

Between November 2017 and April 2018, researchers interviewed 42 civilian airstrike victims and witnesses in Nangarhar, Herat and Kabul. 

The result: Both the Afghan government and the US military have developed almost no capacity to investigate civilian casualties arising from its military operations. Overall it has a poor track record conducting investigations into its own military.

At the same time, US forces have downsized their civilian casualties tracking mechanisms and never conduct on-site investigations after attacks resulting in civilian casualties. Instead, they relied on visual and satellite imagery and — this happens very often in my experience — unreliable Afghan security officials.

True victims or witnesses have never been interviewed by the culprits, as the report points out.

"The failure to interview witnesses is a critical flaw in the Resolute Support civilian casualty investigation methodology because it excludes a key source of information, typically leaving investigators with only one side of the story." 
How Civilian Airstrike Deaths In Afghanistan Are Barely Investigated
5
0 votes
relevant?

Would you like to comment? Then register now for free!