Curious minds select the most fascinating podcasts from around the world. Discover hand-piqd audio recommendations on your favorite topics.
piqer for: Global finds Globalization and politics
Nuala Lam is a bilingual freelance journalist with a focus on civil society, justice, and identity in China. She speaks, reads and writes Mandarin Chinese and forms her analysis of contemporary China through both English and Chinese language media. She has worked for NGOs and news media in Beijing and Shanghai and has also spent extended periods in the Chinese countryside, seeing the country's diversity and uneven development first-hand.
Her postgraduate research at the London School of Economics focussed on English-language coverage of China, investigating the translation of journalistic ethics between differing political contexts. She also holds a first class degree in Chinese and History from the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
In this blog post Dr Shou Huisheng, Senior Fellow at the Statecraft Institution, and Research Fellow at the National Strategy Institute, Tsinghua University, points out some common misconceptions about China’s role on the African continent.
He argues Chinese state activities in Africa are mistakenly understood through the lens of neo-colonialism. There may be something to this idea. UCLA professor Ching Kwan Lee spent six years doing fieldwork in copper mines and on construction sites in Zambia for her 2017 book The Specter of Global China. She concluded that “Chinese state investment presents unique potential and perils for African development” which are distinct from those posed by “global private capital”. She found Chinese companies (often with close relationships to the Chinese state) showed a tendency to favor lasting ties with government and industry in Zambia over short-term profits.
Shou’s post raises important questions about how we understand Chinese investment in African countries, but short of rather vague references to development, he doesn’t pin down China’s objectives on the continent. He argues that quantitative research is the route to understanding the relationship between China and Africa and laments the lack of such studies. Interestingly, Shou points to domestic public opinion as a potential factor in the CCPs failure to provide statistics on its activities on the African continent:
Strands of [public opinion] see China’s involvement in Africa as “handing free gifts to other countries” while many regions of China are still relatively poor.
Shou’s post should be treated with caution. He makes some useful points about the exaggerations and inaccuracies which underpin a neo-colonial framing of China’s activities in Africa. But when it comes to accounting for China’s objectives on the continent he presumes ‘development’ to be a sufficient explanation—that’s not going to fly with readers familiar with the contentious history of foreign aid.