Channels
Log in register
piqd uses cookies and other analytical tools to offer this service and to enhance your user experience.

Your podcast discovery platform

Curious minds select the most fascinating podcasts from around the world. Discover hand-piqd audio recommendations on your favorite topics.

You are currently in channel:

Global finds

Rashmi Vasudeva
Features writer on health, lifestyle and the Arts, digital marketing blogger, mother
View piqer profile
piqer: Rashmi Vasudeva
Thursday, 23 November 2017

In The Year Of Weinstein, It Is Time To Ask If Sex Addiction Is A Sham

There has been a rash of sexual abuse accusations, counter-accusations, rape and sexual assault charges this year. The names are big and powerful and the accusers many. From #MeToo campaigns online to solid consequences in the real world (think Harvey Weinstein), the accusations are being taken seriously.

A good time then, to examine whether sex addiction is real or if it is just another sham. This long-read by Emily Bobrow is not just timely but is also a necessary deeper look into who exactly a sex addict is and what it means to bandy about the term. It examines whether sexually deviant behaviour should be treated as a problem of addiction at all in the first place. By pathologising (and providing a certain sense of comfort and relief to the ‘addict’), are we losing our way? Are we failing to deal with the underlying (other) causes of such behaviour?

Worryingly, a growing number of sex therapists feel that treating sex addiction like substance abuse is doing more harm than good. Though sex addicts are equally self-destructive and continue to compulsively engage in that behaviour despite losing everything, many other factors are dissimilar. For instance, withdrawal symptoms. For substance addicts, the symptoms are physiological and medically serious while for sex addicts it usually stops at distress or anxiety. Some of the psychiatrists she speaks to have strong views about why sex addiction is not a thing. Keith Humphreys from Stanford is rather dismissive of the idea that one can be addicted to things like food and sex that human beings have to do to survive though he is not denying it is a problem. “Substances like heroin, by contrast, not only more dramatically hijack our brain’s pleasure pathways but also inspire behaviour that threatens people’s survival,” he says.

Ultimately the question is one of reduction. The argument the author is making is that human sexuality is too complicated an issue to box our understanding of it into pathological labelling.

In The Year Of Weinstein, It Is Time To Ask If Sex Addiction Is A Sham
5
0 votes
relevant?

Would you like to comment? Then register now for free!