Channels
Log in register
piqd uses cookies and other analytical tools to offer this service and to enhance your user experience.

Your podcast discovery platform

Curious minds select the most fascinating podcasts from around the world. Discover hand-piqd audio recommendations on your favorite topics.

You are currently in channel:

Globalization and politics

Michael Cruickshank
Freelance Conflict Journalist
View piqer profile
piqer: Michael Cruickshank
Wednesday, 22 February 2017

Why The Rise Of Authoritarianism Is A Global Catastrophe

Since the fall of the Soviet Union, many within the educated classes thought that democracy and human rights were preeminent. Humanity was entering a golden age of ever-increasing political participation which would lead to greater levels of personal freedom. In 2017, these predictions look remarkably naive.

Indeed, between 2000 and 2015 democracy fell apart in at least 27 countries - places like Thailand, Turkey and Russia. As well China – the foremost non-democratic power in the world rose to prominence, bringing prosperity for many of its citizens without the trappings of 'freedom'. While some other regions (most notably West Africa) saw increases in democracy, the overall trend was negative.

And now the authoritarian tide has reached the West, the great former bastion of democracy. Leaders with a disdain for democratic institutions have now risen to power in Hungary, Poland, and most notably, the US with President Trump. People are asking the question: is democracy the only way forward? Does authoritarianism offer elegant solutions to the problems of the modern world?

This article by Garry Kasparov and Thor Halvorssen shows this is not the case. Building on their own personal experiences of oppression from authoritarian states, they show that these regimes are indeed bad for humanity. From productivity to happiness and economic stability, they show that there is little to back up ideas that autocracies can do it better. Moreover, they condemn the democratic governments and institutions who continue to do business with and support these regimes for seemingly cynical gains.

Coming before a series of make-or-break elections in the EU, this article is a strong argument against the lure of populist authoritarian views. As well, it attempts to end the moral equivalencies being drawn between democratic and non-democratic governments. 

Why The Rise Of Authoritarianism Is A Global Catastrophe
8.8
6 votes
relevant?

Would you like to comment? Then register now for free!

Comments 3
  1. User deleted
    User deleted · Created more than 2 years ago ·

    The article cited does not mention President Trump. Yet your curator writes "Leaders with a disdain for democratic institutions have now risen to power in Hungary, Poland, and most notably the United States with President Trump."
    Trump is a product of democracy, having been elected despite the undemocratic attempts of his own party to stop his nomination. At this early stage he can surely only have distain for the people obstructing him?
    This would seem to be the media, and people in the prosperous coastal areas who didn't vote for him. It seems to me that they distain democracy - and that it's too early to say if Trump will follow suite.
    I'm no Trump supporter, but I'm expecting more care from your curators in their introductions to these articles.
    This article was actually about a new global paradigm. It could have benefitted from discussing the countries where democracy isn't possible. The failure to understand this reality (and to preach democracy like 19th century missionaries), is the root cause (along with inequality) of what we're seeing in Syria, Libya, Egypt, Iraq etc.

    1. Michael Cruickshank
      Michael Cruickshank · Created more than 2 years ago ·

      Understand your point, however, I specifically wrote "democratic institutions". In this case, I was referring to the Judicial Branch of the government, when Trump attacked judges who blocked his illegal immigration ban. Additionally, his attacks on the media echo similar attacks made by authoritarian rulers the world over.

    2. User deleted
      User deleted · Created more than 2 years ago ·

      @Michael Cruickshank Ah OK. But the thing is that the judiciary is not elected and so is very definitely not a "democratic institution". It's members are appointed and serve pretty much for life, and cannot be held accountable - least of all by the electorate. It's vital for democracy that the judiciary are completely separate from the democratic institutions.
      And the media are certainly not a democratic institution. I think you'll find that the world's actual dictators (about which Gary Gasparaov was writing) have very servile media. They don't have to engage with critics like Trump is doing.