Channels
Log in register
piqd uses cookies and other analytical tools to offer this service and to enhance your user experience.

Your podcast discovery platform

Curious minds select the most fascinating podcasts from around the world. Discover hand-piqd audio recommendations on your favorite topics.

You are currently in channel:

Globalization and politics

Elvia Wilk
Writer, editor
View piqer profile
piqer: Elvia Wilk
Wednesday, 22 March 2017

Away From Fascism And Toward Norway(ish)

Among all the opinion pieces about how to steer the West away from fascism, this essay by George Lakey prompts one to think in the other direction: given historical precedent, what might we run toward rather than away from?

Lakey writes that he sees “in polarization both crisis and opportunity”, and offers Norway’s (relative) evasion of authoritarian takeover in the 1930s as a counter-example to Germany’s. The two countries, which had demographic and economic similarities, took tellingly divergent paths. Lakey writes that Norway’s social democracy rose above other movements due to a combination of organized protests with economic bases (boycotts, strikes) and a grassroots co-op infrastructure that proved sustainable in the moments when top-down power faltered.

Lakey’s prescription for what to do sounds relatively self-evident: 

“The key to avoiding fascism? An organized left with a strong vision and broad support.” 

But the means of organization as the left continues to splinter is the question. Lakey references the Standing Rock protesters’ solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement as an example of cross-collaboration between groups with much to gain from mutual support and everything to lose from fractioning. He also points to Bernie Sanders’ connecting of the working class across boundaries like race. The word the author looking for at the end to describe the means to unite, I believe, is “intersectionality”.

Away From Fascism And Toward Norway(ish)
8.8
6 votes
relevant?

Would you like to comment? Then register now for free!

Comments 4
  1. Marcus von Jordan
    Marcus von Jordan · Created about 2 years ago ·

    Even though I appreciate the result, I have to say that the arguments leading to it seem to be a little random? There are so many other impacts that might have caused different development in both countries and the same time I do think that the situation was never really similiar. To name two relevant other conditions: Size/population. And while Germany suffered this "national tragedy" of WWI that lead to a toxic political instability until 1933, Norway was hardly touched by WWI. To say that the split of the left was the (only) reason that caused the Third Reich is just wrong.
    Nevertheless - collaboration of the left and solidarity of the progressives is the order of the day for sure. No matter where.

    1. Elvia Wilk
      Elvia Wilk · Created about 2 years ago ·

      I agree: I think the article has a great premise (and one I want to consider) but deserves to be three times as long with a lot more attention to historical specificity. I'm looking for more writing on this if you come across any!

  2. Rachel DuBois
    Rachel DuBois · Created about 2 years ago ·

    Another article of his that makes good reading as a follow up to this one: http://wagingnonviolen...

    1. Elvia Wilk
      Elvia Wilk · Created about 2 years ago ·

      Thank you! Super helpful. I don't agree with all points but they're all helpful. Especially: "10. See U.S. polarization as opportunity." Thinking about what that could mean...

Stay up to date – with a newsletter from your channel on Globalization and politics.