Curious minds select the most fascinating podcasts from around the world. Discover hand-piqd audio recommendations on your favorite topics.
piqer for: Global finds Technology and society Globalization and politics
Elvia Wilk is a writer and editor living in New York and Berlin, covering art, architecture, urbanism, and technology. She contributes to publications like Frieze, Artforum, e-flux, die Zeit, the Architectural Review, and Metropolis. She's currently a contributing editor at e-flux Journal and Rhizome.
Among all the opinion pieces about how to steer the West away from fascism, this essay by George Lakey prompts one to think in the other direction: given historical precedent, what might we run toward rather than away from?
Lakey writes that he sees “in polarization both crisis and opportunity”, and offers Norway’s (relative) evasion of authoritarian takeover in the 1930s as a counter-example to Germany’s. The two countries, which had demographic and economic similarities, took tellingly divergent paths. Lakey writes that Norway’s social democracy rose above other movements due to a combination of organized protests with economic bases (boycotts, strikes) and a grassroots co-op infrastructure that proved sustainable in the moments when top-down power faltered.
Lakey’s prescription for what to do sounds relatively self-evident:
“The key to avoiding fascism? An organized left with a strong vision and broad support.”
But the means of organization as the left continues to splinter is the question. Lakey references the Standing Rock protesters’ solidarity with the Black Lives Matter movement as an example of cross-collaboration between groups with much to gain from mutual support and everything to lose from fractioning. He also points to Bernie Sanders’ connecting of the working class across boundaries like race. The word the author looking for at the end to describe the means to unite, I believe, is “intersectionality”.
Stay up to date – with a newsletter from your channel on Globalization and politics.
Even though I appreciate the result, I have to say that the arguments leading to it seem to be a little random? There are so many other impacts that might have caused different development in both countries and the same time I do think that the situation was never really similiar. To name two relevant other conditions: Size/population. And while Germany suffered this "national tragedy" of WWI that lead to a toxic political instability until 1933, Norway was hardly touched by WWI. To say that the split of the left was the (only) reason that caused the Third Reich is just wrong.
Nevertheless - collaboration of the left and solidarity of the progressives is the order of the day for sure. No matter where.
Another article of his that makes good reading as a follow up to this one: http://wagingnonviolen...