Channels
Log in register
piqd uses cookies and other analytical tools to offer this service and to enhance your user experience.

Your podcast discovery platform

Curious minds select the most fascinating podcasts from around the world. Discover hand-piqd audio recommendations on your favorite topics.

You are currently in channel:

Globalization and politics

Santiago Saez Moreno
Journalist
View piqer profile
piqer: Santiago Saez Moreno
Wednesday, 15 March 2017

A Symphony Of Assumptions (And How They Could Be The End Of Europe As We Know It)

After reading The Plot Against Europe, I wasn't sure if I should recommend it here. We had a very interesting internal discussion, and we finally decided it was a good idea to open the debate, which I hope will follow in the comments section.

Let's start by saying that this is a piece of fiction. It's the year 2022. The European Union and NATO have collapsed and Russia has invaded Estonia. Now comes the tale of how all this came to happen, going step by step and region by region, covering most of Europe.

This is a very original way of going over recent events in Europe. It's compelling, and tackles quite a bit of complexity in a 20-minute read. For readers with a bit of knowledge of what's going on in the continent, The Plot Against Europe can be an interesting recap.

But

The problem is that most of Griffiths' assumptions are, to say the least, far-fetched. He builds a story of evil conspirators working together like clockwork to punish even the tiniest mistake. A myriad of extremist groups (for Griffiths, that's everyone not strictly neoliberal, from Jobbik to Die Linke and anti-fracking groups) ready to strike. At the helm of that conspiracy is (of course) Vladimir Putin, who the author expects to win every move in the next five years.

All is realpolitik: the population is powerless, or rather, doesn't exist at all. And the author raises further assumptions on these assumptions to build a nightmarish house of cards.

Still, it's interesting to take a look at the fears and worldview of neoliberalism as an ideology. These guys must feel really threatened.  And I'd like to look at the bright side: if you, like me, lean to the left, this can really burst your bubble. I had mine obliterated. I even felt insulted at times. Feels ok now.

What's your take?

A Symphony Of Assumptions (And How They Could Be The End Of Europe As We Know It)
8.9
7 votes
relevant?

Would you like to comment? Then register now for free!

Comments 5
  1. User deleted
    User deleted · Created about 2 years ago ·

    nice to learn how 'think tanks' work, grácias por este piq! however, sentences like "Edward Snowden, on whose chest Putin had pinned a Hero of the Russian Federation Prize in 2018, had seen to that" turn me off (parentheses don't really cure the flaw). i'm all for busting bubbles, particularly my own, but not by diving into neoliberal(?) paranoia. read it anyway.

    1. Santiago Saez Moreno
      Santiago Saez Moreno · Created about 2 years ago ·

      Hi Christoph, and thanks for the comment!

      I agree. It has highly insulting paragraphs. I follow the climate movement closely, and almost stopped reading when the author implied that anti-fracking movement was part of the Putin-led conspiracy (just to sell Russian gas).

      The thing is, this particular article is built on paranoia and exteme generalizations, but the format is great. Everyone is looking for ways to engage readers and explore new ways of doing journalism, and this article uses some very interesting ideas.

      It's a shame that its info doesn't match reality...

    2. User deleted
      User deleted · Created about 2 years ago ·

      @Santiago Saez Moreno just go on to piq controversial stuff, santiago, even if reading this piece... fue un insulto : )

    3. Frederik Fischer
      Frederik Fischer · Created about 2 years ago ·

      @Santiago Saez Moreno On the format: The widely shared "How to build an autocracy" is also a part of this apparently booming genre: https://www.theatlanti...

      What I crave for: An ideological interpretation of news and politics that are actually happening. There are fights between schools of thought going on in politics. Often they are really easy to spot for people who studied politics / political economics, but "normal" readers can hardly be expected to decipher anything that goes beyond (neo)liberal, socialist, etc.

      I tink it would be incredibly helpful to shed some more light on the underlying mindset of economists and politicians.

    4. Santiago Saez Moreno
      Santiago Saez Moreno · Created about 2 years ago ·

      @Frederik Fischer Thanks for the link Frederik! I had seen the headline around, but hadn't had time to read it yet. Will do asap.

      I think this is article portrays an extreme view of the realist school of thought, and as such it has enormous pitfalls. It's obviosly delusional, but let's not forget that this is an influential point of view.

Stay up to date – with a newsletter from your channel on Globalization and politics.